Committee Report NSC

 

North Somerset Council

 

REPORT TO THE Organisational Effectiveness Policy & Scrutiny Panel

 

Date of Meeting: 12 May 2005

 

Subject of Report: The Panels Work Plan

 

Town or parish:

 

Officer/Member presenting: Councillor Steadman Panel Chairman

 

Key Decision: No

 

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the Panel discuss and review the current work plan items with a view to establishing an updated version for the coming year.  In doing so, Members should also consider any new items (within the remit of the Panel), that may benefit from Panel involvement. This should also include forthcoming priorities based upon performance issues. 

 

1.                  Summary of Report

 

This report provides a current version of the Panels work plan. In reviewing the items, Members should note that there are some topics that are still currently ongoing and some that may be coming to an end.  This is an opportunity to completely review the items and set a new work plan for the coming year.  The report also reminds Members of the key factors when deciding how and whether a topic should be investigated.

 

Attached at appendix 1 is a terms of reference template to be completed for any ‘in depth’ investigations that the panel may wish to carryout.[J1] 

 

2.                  Policy

 

Potential policy implications may arise dependent upon the outcome of any future investigation.[J2] 

 

3.                  Details

 

As the Panel is considering its work plan it is felt beneficial to remind Members of the key factors when discussing work planning.

 

Primarily, you will need to assess the relevance, interest and impact any investigation will have, for the Council and the Community. It is better to consider a few topics in detail than skate over the surface of a large number of issues.

 

Members are able to suggest items for their own Panel work plan at any time (in line with the Panel remit), these must be received at the Town Hall (Democratic Services) at least nine working days before the next Panel meeting. The Panel can then discuss at its meeting whether or not it wishes for that item to be included on the work plan.

 

Once the topics have been chosen, terms of reference should be set out as follows:

 

·        Why -        aims

·        What -       should be included/excluded

·        How -        appropriate methods of investigation

·        Where -    locations of meetings/any visits

·        Who -        use appropriate Members & Officers skills

·        When -      clear timescales for undertaking investigation and reporting back.

 

These criteria should assist the Panel in remaining focused. To aid this process a proforma is attached at appendix 1 which should be completed for any ‘in depth’ investigation that the panel wishes to carryout.

 

Members are reminded that a range of approaches can be considered, such as single issue agendas, Individual Panel Members being assigned specific responsibilities or small working groups investigating a specific topic over a short period (but not ongoing sub-committees).

 

It is important that flexibility is also left in the work plan to allow for any unexpected issues that may arise during the coming year. 

[J3] 

4.                  Consultation

 

Not applicable at this time[J4] 

 

5.                  Financial Implications

 

Potential financial implications may arise dependent upon the outcome of any future investigation.[J5] 

 

6.                  Equality Implications

 

Where appropriate equalities issues will be considered as part of any investigations undertaken by the panel[J6] 

 

7.                  Corporate Implications

 

None specifically at this time however implications may arise as part of the panels investigations. The panels work contributes primarily to the corporate aim of Ensuring Continuous Improvement[J7] 

 

8.                  Options considered

 

Options relate to those issues that are to be considered for inclusion on the work plan[J8] 

 

Author

 

Shane Trevett

Scrutiny & Performance Team

shane.trevett@n-somerset.gov.uk

Tel: 01275 884009[J9] 

 

Background Papers

The Panels previous work plan and meeting minutes[J10] 

 

Organisational Effectiveness

Policy & Scrutiny Panel

Work Plan

 

 

Panel remit

 

Best Value Reviews

Organisational Performance

Contract Overview

Human Resources

Equalities

 

The Work Plan outlined below will be constantly reviewed and may be subject to change.

 

Current Topics for Investigation

Detail/Notes

Timescale


Human Resources Strategy

 

To understand the development of  & implementing of the Council’s HR strategy. To identify issues arising that the panel may wish to investigate and consider further. To monitor the implementation.

 

 

Initial presentation / report on the current position of the HR strategy at July Panel

 

Further timescale to be decided.

 

 

Effectiveness of Area Committees

 

Raised by Constitutional working group (2003)

Concern that Area Committees are not as effective as they could be in covering local issues.

 

 

Changes to the operation of Area Committees to be reviewed in May 2005

 

Guidance will be issued to Members informing them of the scope of issues considered by Area Committees in spring 2005

 

 

Effective communication with the public

 

Recommendation from Constitutional working group (2003) and recent External Audit report ‘Review of Political Structures’

Examine ways of improving communication and engagement, including public participation in O&S process

 

 

 

 

Initial presentation of Council’s new Communication Strategy to July Panel.

 

Further timescale to be decided.

Risk Management

 

The Panel consider how the Council are proposing to address the risk management

Initial report to Nov Panel outlining Councils proposed policy / strategy on risk management.

 

Further timescale to be decided.

 

 

Best Value Review of maximising staff attendance

 

In line with the Council’s policy on Best Value, Members of the appropriate Policy & Scrutiny Panel are to be involved in scrutinising the progress of reviews. This particular review is also linked to the Panels consideration of the HR strategy.

 

Update of Best Value Review and proposed course of Action report to be considered in February 2005


Council building and compliance with the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA)

 

To investigate the readiness of the Council’s building stock with regards to DDA.

 

Initial presentation Nov Panel.

 

Further updates to be provided including access audit on town hall

 

 Timescale to be decided

 

 

Information and Communications Technology and Information Systems Strategy 2004-7

 

 

Possibility of setting up a joint working group with the Finance and Resources Policy and Scrutiny Panel to monitor the strategy

 

 

To be discussed with F&R chairman and discussed at the February / March meeting 2005

 

 

2005/06 Budget and Medium term Financial Plan

 

To understand pressures on Council spending and proposed amendments to the third MTFP.

 

 

Jan/Feb 2005

 

Topics for Future Investigation

Details/Notes

Timescale

 

Political Structures

 

Following a reference from the Executive on 7th September 2004, an update on the progress of the action plan based on the findings and recommendations from the RSM Robson Rhodes report be provided to the Panel.

 

June / July 2005

 

Procurement

 

Following the initial investigation of:

§         Presentation of baseline report to July Panel, and

§         Presentation and discussion on draft Procurement Strategy at September Panel (Members of F&R PSP to be invited)

The strategy was recommended to the Executive. The Panel will revisit the strategy in the future to consider its revision and implementation

 

Spring / Summer

 

Electoral Process

 

Review our approach to Electoral process in light of Electoral Commission consultation.

 

 

To be decided.

 

Emergency Planning

 

What systems do we have in place and are they sufficiently robust?

 

 

 

 

To be decided.

Ongoing Topics

Detail/Notes

Timescale

 

General Performance Monitoring incl;

·        Key Corporate Performance Indicators

·        Comprehensive Performance Assessment

·        External Audit Annual Letter

·        Performance Plan

·        Best Value Reviews

·        Best Value Inspection of Partnerships

 

 

The first report was received at the September ’03 Panel meeting. Regular reporting should assist the Panel to identify any areas that you may wish to investigate further.

 

KCPI’s Quarterly incl.

Quarter 3 Performance analysis – 17th March 2005

 

Other areas as appropriate (see Appendix 1 of last Performance Monitoring report)

 

 

Topics now concluded & taken off work plan

·        S106 Agreements – update from Councillor Duck at November ’03 Panel meeting (?)

·        New build contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 


APPENDIX 1

 

NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL

POLICY AND SCRUTINY PANELS

           

WORK PLAN ITEMS 2004-2005

 

Terms of Reference for

 

 

Purpose of this work / anticipated value of its work:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key objectives:

 

  1.

 

 

     2.

 

 

  3.

 

 

 

Scope of the work:

 

  1.

 

 

     2.

 

 

  3.

 

 

 

Not included in the scope:

 

  1.

 

 

     2.

 

 

 

Terms of Reference prepared by:         

 

T of Ref agreed by O&S Panel:

 

Method of Investigation:

 

Panel Chair

 

Portfolio Holder

 

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND:

1

 

2

 

3

 

 

SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR THE PANEL TO ADDRESS:

 

 

 

INFORMATION GATHERING:

 

Witnesses to be invited

 

Name

Organisation/Position

Reason for Inviting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site Visits

 

Location

Purpose of visit

 

 

 

Key Documents / Background Data / Research

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

 

TIMESCALE

 

Starting:

 

Ending:

 

 

OUTPUTS TO BE PRODUCED

 

1

 

2

 

 

REPORTING ARRANGEMENTS

 

Body

Date

 

 

 

 

 

MONITORING/FEEDBACK ARRANGEMENTS

Body

Details

Date

 

 

 


Page: 1
 [J1]Make a clear, brief statement summarising the decision or action needed, e.g. “to decide/adopt/amend”

Page: 1
 [J2]Summarise the part of the Corporate Plan, Directorate Business Plan or other plan or policy document that supports the report.

Page: 1
 [J3]The detail of the report should not exceed four pages in addition to the standard paragraphs 4 – 9 and any appendices.  Additional paragraph headings 4.2, 4.2 etc can be added as required.

Page: 1
 [J4]Summarise who has been consulted internally and externally e.g., statutory, trades union, parish councils, ward members, other.  List response received.

Page: 1
 [J5]Give the revenue and capital cost of the proposal, and whether it is in addition to existing approved budget.

Page: 1
 [J6]State any implications for equality in either employment or service provision.  Consider how your report could affect sections of the community in terms of race, sex, disability, sexual orientation, religion or other belief, age, social exclusion and other groups.

Page: 1
 [J7]List any cross service implications, egg for Children, Sustainability, Legal, Human Resources, Property, Human Rights, Proportionality, Crime and Disorder, etc. and include comments on any which are relevant.

Page: 1
 [J8]List all other options which have been considered in making the recommendation, with a brief explanation of why they have been rejected.

Page: 1
 [J9]Give the name, job title and telephone number of the person who actually wrote the report.

Page: 1
 [J10]All background papers significantly used in preparing the report must be listed, together with an official departmental file reference.  Directors are responsible for ensuring that background papers can be accessed by the public for up to six years.