Have your say
Rate this page...

Untidy land costs siblings a tidy sum

Date: 30/11/2011

A brother and sister have been ordered to pay hundreds of pounds for  failing to comply with a notice to clear untidy land at an address in Weston-super-Mare.

In a prosecution brought by us, magistrates heard that this case was a long-standing matter dating back to 2009.  During October that year we received complaints about the poor state of buildings and land at 2 Rosedale Avenue in Weston.

A senior enforcement officer visited and found that the property was in a poor state of repair and the land was overgrown. There were broken panes of glass in some of the front windows and the paintwork on windows and door frames was flaking off.  The back garden was very overgrown to the height of up to six feet in places.

As the local planning authority we can serve a notice on the owner and occupier of land requiring them to take steps to 'remedy the condition' of that land and having visited the property the officer was of the view that the condition of the property was having an 'adverse impact on the amenity of the area'. 

Between December 2009 and January 2011, we tried to get the occupier, Jonathan Colwill’s, co-operation in carrying out repairs and clearing the land.  During this time, Mr Colwill carried out some work to the property but more was required.  It was explained to him that if he did not clear the land we would have to consider further action.

Mr Colwill told the council that the property was owned by him and his sister, Joan Colwill.

A further site visit was carried out at the beginning of March this year. The paintwork around the window and door frames at the front was perished and flaking and the vertical tiles hanging on the window bay were in a poor condition. The garden was overgrown and unkempt with rubbish scattered about.

In April notices were served on both Colwills requiring that by the beginning of July they tidy up the front of the building, remove all the rubbish in the garden (including waste metal such as oil drums and greenhouse frames; waste plastic; broken glass; and dead trees and plants), remove two derelict sheds and prune or cutback all overgrown trees, shrubs and vegetation.

On July 7, the officer paid a visit to the address and found that the notice had not been complied with and photographs were taken.

On the same day he received a telephone call from Joan Colwill. He made it clear to her that she was in breach of the notice but agreed to hold any criminal proceedings in abeyance until July 25 to provide her and her brother with additional time to carry out the works required by the notice.

On July 28,  the officer visited the property again.  He noted that the flaking paintwork had been removed but no repainting had been done, the tiles had not been cleaned and although works had been carried out to remove some of the vegetation in the property, there were still areas where it was overgrown and waste items were still there.  The two sheds had not been removed.

The Colwills attended North Somerset Magistrates Court on 16 November and pleaded guilty in part.  This plea was accepted by the council. After hearing their mitigation the court sentenced them to a total of £875 in fines and costs.

Cllr Peter Bryant, executive member whose portfolio includes environmental issues said that enforcement action had been necessary as persuasion had not had the desired effect.

"The property in question was, frankly, an eyesore. While we can sympathise to a small degree with the circumstances of the owners, they seem to have been oblivious to the effects that the poor condition of the property was having on neighbours and other people in the area."